Blog: Lawyer’s Insight on Legal
Matters:
- Legal Process -
Lawyer's Insight' is a periodic blog by Mr. Samore on
current legal issues that informs readers how current, legal
events influence Americans' lives. If you would like to ask
Mr. Samore to address a particular concern which you may
have, simply send an email to the address at left with
subject "Questions for Lawyer's Insight."
Click on the links below to quickly reach a particular topic,
or just scroll down to read what is of interest. Other
sources of information from Mr. Samore are on the
Common Questions and About Us pages of this website.
If you don’t see a link to a topic of interest, check the other Lawyer’s Insight pages.
Legal Process
•
What are the financial commitments to help avoid conviction consequences?
•
We just received a Subpoena to testify and don't want to go. What should we do?
•
I just received a Grad Jury Target Letter! What do I do?
•
What basic information is needed for criminal prosecution cases?
•
How does plea bargaining work?
•
Why can't a simple majority of the Jury reach the verdict?
What are the financial commitments to help avoid conviction consequences?
July 14, 2016
Consequences of any conviction can be severe and follow you (and your family) all your life, so we like our clients to be
realistic about the challenges that lie ahead. We encourage our clients to quietly consider the financial commitment that is
required to retain any experienced private attorney to represent your most precious interests. Because most employed
people are ineligible for a Public Defender, you must decide if you can afford a quality defense. Most lawyers do not give
clients this opportunity before an office conference, and too many attorneys pressure folks to sign major obligations. Our
office does not work that way.
We do not try and scare anyone, nor do we minimize the
importance and dangers of felony prosecutions. You will
hire us because it is the best decision for you. There will
always be someone who will undercut the price of a
quality attorney, and either demand additional payments
down the line or commit less time and effort because your
money ran out. You would not fall for that misleading
approach from a car salesman, and you are wise not to
risk your future to someone who does not confront with
the truth, however daunting it may be.
You want a lawyer who will also explain how the resources you commit for a qualified forensic examiner or other expert
witness, and an experienced, diligent private investigator can be every bit as important as your attorney. These expenses
should be included in any initial consultation and determination of what "fees and costs" to defend your case are. When you
leave a voice mail or message, find out how quickly your lawyer responds to your reasonable questions and concerns.
If the State goes through the Preliminary Hearing procedure, the likelihood is high that you will be bound over for further
prosecution. The reason is two-fold: Defense witnesses almost never testify at a Preliminary Hearing, because the Defense
does not really know until that Hearing what the evidence is. The second reason is that their standard to bind an accused
over is so low, "probable cause" that a crime has been committed, which does not even require fifty percent likelihood in
proof.
You will not be found "guilty" or "not Guilty" at a Preliminary Hearing or Grand Jury Presentment, so it is basic good sense
and legal sense to hold back on showing the prosecutors what problems they have with their case against you. At this early
stage of the proceedings, we learn the extent of evidence the State has and how determined they are to make you and
example, even if a conviction or even the publicity!) causes permanent damage to you and your family. To defend against
allegations, two other expenses you are likely to incur, could also be very helpful to achieving justice on your behalf. We give
you all this information so you will be able to make the best decision for yourself.
See these pages:
Federal & State Felonies • Sex Offenses • Violent Crimes • White Collar Crimes
I just received a Subpoena to testify and don't want to go. What should we do?
March 8, 2015
When you receive a subpoena, the first thing you should do is see who issued the subpoena to you. It could be from a Grand
Jury (read on for more info about grand juries), the district court, or one of the parties to a legal action. You should also
verify whether the subpoena came from a federal or state court. All of that information should be on the face of the
subpoena, as well as the telephone number of the person to contact if you have questions.
A subpoena is a piece of paper you should respect
because, if it is lawfully served and you do not honor it by
showing up at the date and time identified on the
subpoena, you can get into trouble. Under most
circumstances, a subpoena must be handed to you by a
sheriff's deputy or another impartial person who is paid
by a third-party for serving process. You are also entitled
to be reimbursed for your time and travel expense in
appearing at the place you are asked to appear. This sum
should be paid to you ahead of time and most reputable
folks make arrangements for payment of the subpoena
even before it is served.
If you still have questions, call the number of the person listed at the bottom of that first page and ask. If you do not receive
an answer you feel is satisfactory, you have every right to contact an attorney and describe the situation. The attorney may
charge you some modest amount for the advice, and that is a good investment, because you do not want to get into more
trouble than you really need by just ignoring a subpoena. Let your attorney make the proper contact with the responsible
persons and provide you sensible information on how to proceed. It saves time and money in the long run.
See these pages:
Federal & State Felonies • Sex Offenses • Violent Crimes • White Collar Crimes
I just received a Grand Jury Target Letter! What do I do?
February 20, 2015
A Target Letter means that the District Attorney thinks that it has substantial evidence you committed a felony crime. The
date of your appearance listed in that letter invites you to go before the Grand Jury and offer your explanation to some crime
which the authorities have been investigating. The only people who testify before a grand jury are usually the detectives who
have been investigation allegations against some citizens. On rare occasions, a person who is not involved in law
enforcement will also testify. The District Attorney decides whom to call as witnesses before a grand jury.
You should probably not respond or testify. A Target Letter is not a subpoena, so you do not have to show up at all. You have
the right to testify if you want, but the cards are definitely stacked against you. A grand jury process is very secretive and is
designed to help the District Attorney obtain an indictment charging someone with a felony crime. If the person suspected of
committing a crime is foolish to testify to the grand jury, he or she does not even get to have a lawyer inside the grand jury
room. The room is closed and all statements are recorded. If you say something that may be untrue, you could be
committing a separate crime. If you are charged, anything you say could be used against you.
This is one of the reasons that the District Attorney does
not like to risk even calling an alleged victim or lay person
as a witness, because his or her statements could later be
used at trial for cross- examination. It is easier to get an
indictment and keep the suspects (and their lawyers) in
the dark about the evidence if only the investigator is
called before the grand jury. That investigator will only
give the grand jury the juicy evidence that would indicate
you committed some crime. The DA would love to have
you out there, all alone, in front of up to 23 grand jurors
who only need to find "probable cause" that a crime has
been committed. Probable cause is a very low standard; it doesn't even have to be fifty percent likely that any crime was
even committed.
But remember: the grand jury does not find you guilty or not guilty, it just moves the case closer to trial by agreeing to have
you indicted. Just being indicted means the charge appears on the public record and that you have to appear in court before
a judge. That alone can mess with a person's life! It also affects the lives of the people around the accused citizen.
If you receive a target letter, get yourself a lawyer right away to start helping you. Even without you actually testifying before
the grand jury, New Mexico is one of the very few states that permits a suspect to present evidence to the grand jury in the
form of affidavits, questions to ask the witnesses, and documentary or photographic evidence. This is very tricky going, so do
not try to do this alone! A lawyer can help you bring together evidence that might explain that no crime occurred or that you
are not a culprit.
See these pages:
Federal & State Felonies • Sex Offenses • Violent Crimes • White Collar Crimes
What basic information is needed for criminal prosecution cases?
August 1, 2014
You or someone you love can be prosecuted in either federal or state court. The Rules are similar but, as far as the
consequences and all the factors that influence how a prosecution is resolved, federal and state courts are very, very different.
.Federal and state courts have different courthouses, different set of judges, different set of prosecutors, and different
punishment for those who are convicted. They even have a different way that cases are brought from mere allegation to trial.
They even have a different prison system, but prison looks a lot the same when you are behind bars. It is our job to keep you
from that humiliating experience.
Many acts are crimes that violate both federal and state
laws. We use the word "alleged" a lot because that means
the Government (by its chosen prosecutors) claim that
someone did a certain act that violates one or more laws,
and "alleged" means it just hasn't been proven. The same
alleged criminal act can be prosecuted in either federal or
state courts and even in both. It is not like the
prosecutors must choose one forum (federal or state) or
the other, but they usually do.
Prosecutors of federal crimes are called "Assistant United
States Attorneys" and work under the "United States Attorney" who is appointed by the President for all fifty states (some of
the states with the largest populations have more than one United States Attorney, who are each appointed for certain areas).
State crimes are prosecuted by the District Attorney who is elected every four years in each of our state's thirteen judicial
districts, and Assistant District Attorneys do the actual prosecuting.
Even (state) Assistant District Attorneys (ADA) will admit that the more prestigious job is to be an Assistant United States
Attorney (AUSA). Many an ADA works years to become qualified for an position as an AUSA. The job pays much more, has
better benefits, and is better funded. All of which is not to say that ADAs are not honorable and capable attorneys. It is just a
fact of life that goes into the mix of your entire case.
A state court felony prosecution may begin with a complaint that leads to a preliminary hearing or a grand jury indictment.
The state's most populous county is around Albuquerque, and the preliminary hearing process has not been used for many a
year. To be indicted by a grand jury, the person suspected of a crime is sent by the DA what is called a "target letter" to
inform the suspect that a hearing on the allegation will be conducted in secret a few days hence.
This is the point at which most defense attorneys wish you would contact us to represent you, because we have a chance to
get some evidence on your behalf to the grand jury. We do not want you ever to testify yourself before the state Grand Jury.
When the Grand Jury meets, it usually hears only a short summary of evidence from the investigators and must, then, vote
by a simple majority of the grand jurors present (up to 23) that it is more likely than not that a crime occurred. That
standard for proof is a lot less than what is necessary to convict you before a jury, but the mere filing of a charge starts the
long and agonizing process leading to possible trial that can adversely effect your life forever. The best result would be if you
were never charged at all.
The investigators of federal prosecutions simply sign an affidavit to a complaint that is enough to have you taken into
custody. If you learn of an investigation into your alleged conduct, try to get a defense attorney to work for you right away, if
you can afford one. Sometimes, we can work with you and the prosecutors to resolve misunderstandings before things get
even more expensive. If you cannot afford an attorney at this "pre-indictment" stage, you will soon be taken before a
magistrate Judge for a Preliminary Hearing and may be held in custody until a federal Grand Jury meets to hear just the
Government's side of the case against you.
Then the really hard work begins. On the other end of the prosecution is a different problem for accused people, perhaps, the
main difference between state and federal systems. The United States Sentencing Guidelines were passed in 1985,
supposedly to take away judges' discretion to vary sentences on the same crime of conviction for different people. The real
reason is that the same Congress who passed these severe, required penalties had passed, only the year before, legislation to
permit prisons to be owned by private corporations for the first time. These corporations needed to be assured of bodies to
fill their cells and be able to bill the taxpayers, and this repulsive coincidence has, thirty years later, left our "Land of the
Free" with the highest percentage of its population in prison -- by far -- than any other country in the world.
For thirty years, our office represents people accused of crimes in both federal and state courts. We handle primarily major
felonies and only rarely do DWI or misdemeanors. We usually do those kind of cases when former clients have a special
problem that they want us to handle. Because we are set up to litigate thoroughly, we handle those cases well, but, if you are
looking for a bargain low price attorney to handle a DWI, please call one of the many attorneys who are set up to handle a
volume of low-cost cases. Our office is set up for individualized, one-on-one, intense commitment to the more major
prosecutions with severe and permanent consequences.
Another nice thing about New Mexico is that we have an active defense bar, which means you have many capable lawyers
who might help you or your loved ones. The key is that you meet, assess, and find that one committed lawyer with whom you
feel you can work to the best result. It is more than just a smile, a handshake, a fancy office, the fee charged, and even the
reputation. It is all those things and a lot more, and you must consider everything when you make this major decision.
See these pages:
Federal & State Felonies • Sex Offenses • Violent Crimes • White Collar Crimes
How does plea bargaining work?
June 30, 2014
I can sure try, but, no matter what I say, I'll have to leave a lot out. Plea Bargains are the way most criminal cases resolve, and
without plea bargaining, the criminal justice system would grind to a halt. There simply are not enough attorneys and judges
and courthouses and law officers to take each case to a trial.
If you ever hear some politician telling you "There is too
much plea bargaining" or "I'll put a stop to plea
bargaining," you can bet your last dollar that he/she is all
bluster and ignorance. (And you can quote me when you
tell them that!) The lawyer's Code of Ethics and Local
Rules REQUIRE us to always work toward resolution of a
pending case by plea bargain, out of respect to judges'
limited time for conducting trials and the enormous
expenses of going to trial.
If you are considering some attorney who acts like
prosecutors are the enemy and postures on a website how combative they are, be careful! This is not even ethical. We
defense trial lawyers are quite capable of fighting to the death for you if a case goes to trial, but it does not serve most people
(whether defendant or alleged victims) to go through the agony of trial.
Trials are exciting for the lawyers but agony for the participants. A good Defense attorney or prosecutor should cultivate
professional relationship with the other side, because it ends up serving the clients better than constant antagonism. When
you have honorable attorneys from both sides, reasonable cops, and sensible judges, plea bargains can be a very fair way to
resolve pending cases.
The Defense is already at a distinct disadvantage when the client is charged, because the law officers have usually been
working on the case many weeks, talking to witnesses and building evidence. Our office examines very closely all the
evidence against our clients. We have several very experienced private investigators who work for us and are assigned to
each case. They leave no stone unturned in finding ways to support our clients; we couldn't get the results that we do
without their excellent work. Although too many officers and even prosecutors meet with witnesses and pressure witnesses
not to talk to anyone representing the Defense, our investigators do their very best to get the full story from the witnesses.
They will also work to develop other witnesses and forensic evidence to support you.
When the case involves forensic evidence such as DNA or ballistics, we shall find the best experts to prepare a report that
explains what the forensic evidence really means. If our client has made admissions or incriminating statements to officers,
we see if those statements occurred after they were entitled to warnings of their precious Constitutional rights.
A developing body of research shows how very often people "falsely confess" to crimes they did not commit and how law
officers are trained to specialize in twisting unsophisticated folks up in knot to obtain admissions, whether or not the
admissions are true. Highly-qualified psychologists can determine whether a suspect actually understood his rights or was
intentionally misled or just conceding to get out of an uncomfortable situation. We shall consider that option if it applies in
your case.
Once our investigation is complete, we can set a time to talk to the prosecutor about the evidence from both sides. Any
competent defense attorney cannot boast that he or she wins every case or has special powers, because we have an obligation
to respect the alleged victims and the prosecutors; they have reasonable concerns, too. If an attorney misrepresents facts or
law to the other side, he/she may get away with such behavior once or twice, but soon that kind of deceit hurts the lawyer's
reputation in the legal community and will hurt all future clients. Over the past thirty years, our office has developed a
reputation with both State and Federal prosecutors that helps reach a fair resolution that respects both sides of the process.
As your advocate, we consider the hundreds of variations on the your situation and your particular, most important
concerns. Sometimes, a client comes to us and says that conviction of any charge will destroy their family or job, so we really
just must to trial or discover a fatal flaw in the prosecution that will convince the prosecutor to dismiss the case without even
going to trial. Other times, the client know the risk of trial and wants to see if we can narrow our differences with the
prosecutors. Sometimes, a client tell us from the beginning, "I want to admit that I did something wrong, but these charges
are worse than what I did."
It is our job to do all the above work and more, but we do not make the final decision - you do. We give you all the
information possible, then you decide.
CAN YOU GIVE US EXAMPLES?
Of course, here are three:
1.
When Thomas' two-year-old son died while in his custody, overeager investigators suspected he was responsible
for the head injuries that killed him. He was charged with first degree murder. We found a world-recognized pathologist
from Minnesota who examined the medical records and concluded that the injuries had actually occurred four weeks earlier,
when the child was living with his Mother. Our investigator found that the child had fallen about eight feet from the
bleachers at a high school basketball game during that
time frame and the subdural bleed probably began then.
On the eve of trial, the Government's own experts finally
admitted their error, agreed with our pathologist, and the
charges were dismissed.
2.
Nathan was a socially inept, naive young man
of 21 who lived his whole life in a remote community of
barely one hundred people. He never had anything close
to a girlfriend, except in his dreams. When a young lady,
whom he knew only by texting, told him that she lived
only a mile way, that her Mother was gone for the
morning, and that he should come over to "have fun" with her, he thought he would have his first sexual experience. Instead,
her Mother came home early, caught them in the act, and only then did he learn that she was just 14. He was looking at
almost twenty years in prison for criminal sexual abuse, but we developed some law that his mistaken belief was a full
defense. The girl helped our case by being telling the prosecutor that she never told Nathan her age and was proud she
looked so grown up. The prosecutor, known to be a man of honor, took a look at these facts, and we resolved the case by
pleading Nathan to a simple misdemeanor assault.
3.
We have had several clients who have faced charges that required specific legal knowledge and, by developing
leaning disability issues, the charges are quietly resolved with no jail time and, oftentimes, no conviction. I never claim
credit for these resolutions, because they take a respected examining psychologist and a fair-minded prosecutor, to protect
the client's interests.
These are among the many examples of how both prosecutor and defense attorneys can work with the families of the alleged
victims and the accused persons to reach a fair resolution that serves the parties and society.
See these pages:
Federal & State Felonies • Sex Offenses • Violent Crimes • White Collar Crimes
Why can't a simple majority of the Jury reach the verdict?
July 25, 2013
SOME OF US WONDER WHY JURY VERDICTS IN CRIMINAL TRIALS HAVE TO BE UNANIMOUS. WHY CAN'T A
SIMPLE MAJORITY OF THE JURY REACH THE VERDICT?
Not all countries do it this way, but most countries that
let citizen-jurors make the decision require unanimous
verdicts. There are good reasons why it is this way.
First of all, remember that a jury verdict in a criminal
trial must be unanimous either way: every juror has to
vote "guilty," or every juror has to vote "not guilty." Until
all the jurors agree, one way or another, there is no
verdict to take back to court. As an example of other
ways to do it, back in the time of Jesus, the the Hebrew
elders formed a judicial body known as the Sanhedrin to
make decisions on legal conflicts. If, at the end of a trial, all of the Sanhedrin members (over 100!) voted "guilty," Hebrew
law require that the verdict be vacated, and the trial begun anew. This unique approach is because the law presumed, if
everyone voted guilty on the first ballot, the trial could not have been fair. (Think how long our cases would go on with such
a standard!)
In other Western democracies, a panel of judges make the decisions in criminal trials, and they do not have to agree on the
verdict. If they vote 2-1 in Britain, the verdict is set.
We have a long history of trial by a "jury of peers" in this country, established in a time when early Americans were very
suspicious that a panel of judges (almost always from the richer class) would be too biased against any accused citizen.
Before a jury (of twelve or six, depending on the charge) and alternates is even chosen to serve, the assigned judge and
attorneys for the participants are supposed to ask questions of a larger group of potential jurors to try and pick a fair and
balanced jury.
The process of jury selection is called voir dire, a French phrase that means "to tell the truth." If you go to trial with our
office, we shall work closely with you quite to review juror questionnaires (provided a few days before the process of jury
selection begins) and receive your opinions on which jurors you think will be more fair to you.
See more about violent crimes.
Samore Law • 505-244-0450
Practicing in Albuquerque and across the State of New Mexico
Mailing address: PO Box 1993, Albuquerque, NM 87103
Street address: 300 Central Ave SW, Suite 2500W, Albuquerque
John Samore
Blog: Lawyer’s Insight on Legal
Matters:
- Legal Process -
Lawyer's Insight' is a periodic blog by Mr. Samore
on current legal issues that informs readers how
current, legal events influence
Americans' lives. If you would
like to ask Mr. Samore to
address a particular concern
which you may have, simply
send an email to the address at
left with subject "Questions for
Lawyer's Insight."
Click on the links below to
quickly reach a particular topic, or just scroll down
to read what is of interest. Other sources of
information from Mr. Samore are on the Common
Questions and About Us pages of this website.
Samore Law
505-244-0450
Practicing in Albuquerque and
across the state of New Mexico
Mailing address: PO Box 1993, Albuquerque, NM 87103
Street address: 300 Central Ave SW, Suite 2500W, Albuquerque
If you don’t see a link to a topic of interest, check
the other Lawyer’s Insight pages.
Legal Process
•
What are the financial commitments to help avoid
conviction consequences?
•
We just received a Subpoena to testify and don't
want to go. What should we do?
•
I just received a Grad Jury Target Letter! What do I
do?
•
What basic information is needed for criminal
prosecution cases?
•
How does plea bargaining work?
•
Why can't a simple majority of the Jury reach the
verdict?
What are the financial commitments to help avoid
conviction consequences?
July 14, 2016
Consequences of any conviction can be severe and
follow you (and your family) all your life, so we like
our clients to be realistic about the challenges that
lie ahead. We encourage our clients to quietly
consider the financial commitment that is required
to retain any experienced private attorney to
represent your most precious interests. Because
most employed people are ineligible for a Public
Defender, you must decide if you can afford a
quality defense. Most lawyers do not give clients
this opportunity before an office conference, and
too many attorneys pressure folks to sign major
obligations. Our office does not work that way.
We do not try and
scare anyone, nor do
we minimize the
importance and
dangers of felony
prosecutions. You will hire us because it is the best
decision for you. There will always be someone who
will undercut the price of a quality attorney, and
either demand additional payments down the line
or commit less time and effort because your money
ran out. You would not fall for that misleading
approach from a car salesman, and you are wise not
to risk your future to someone who does not
confront with the truth, however daunting it may
be.
You want a lawyer who will also explain how the
resources you commit for a qualified forensic
examiner or other expert witness, and an
experienced, diligent private investigator can be
every bit as important as your attorney. These
expenses should be included in any initial
consultation and determination of what "fees and
costs" to defend your case are. When you leave a
voice mail or message, find out how quickly your
lawyer responds to your reasonable questions and
concerns.
If the State goes through the Preliminary Hearing
procedure, the likelihood is high that you will be
bound over for further prosecution. The reason is
two-fold: Defense witnesses almost never testify at
a Preliminary Hearing, because the Defense does
not really know until that Hearing what the
evidence is. The second reason is that their
standard to bind an accused over is so low,
"probable cause" that a crime has been committed,
which does not even require fifty percent likelihood
in proof.
You will not be found "guilty" or "not Guilty" at a
Preliminary Hearing or Grand Jury Presentment, so
it is basic good sense and legal sense to hold back
on showing the prosecutors what problems they
have with their case against you. At this early stage
of the proceedings, we learn the extent of evidence
the State has and how determined they are to make
you and example, even if a conviction or even the
publicity!) causes permanent damage to you and
your family. To defend against allegations, two
other expenses you are likely to incur, could also be
very helpful to achieving justice on your behalf. We
give you all this information so you will be able to
make the best decision for yourself.
See these pages:
Federal & State Felonies • Sex Offenses • Violent
Crimes • White Collar Crimes
I just received a Subpoena to testify and don't want
to go. What should we do?
March 8, 2015
When you receive a subpoena, the first thing you
should do is see who issued the subpoena to you. It
could be from a Grand Jury (read on for more info
about grand juries), the district court, or one of the
parties to a legal action. You should also verify
whether the subpoena came from a federal or state
court. All of that information should be on the face
of the subpoena, as well as the telephone number of
the person to contact if you have questions.
A subpoena is a piece
of paper you should
respect because, if it
is lawfully served and
you do not honor it by
showing up at the date and time identified on the
subpoena, you can get into trouble. Under most
circumstances, a subpoena must be handed to you
by a sheriff's deputy or another impartial person
who is paid by a third-party for serving process.
You are also entitled to be reimbursed for your time
and travel expense in appearing at the place you are
asked to appear. This sum should be paid to you
ahead of time and most reputable folks make
arrangements for payment of the subpoena even
before it is served.
If you still have questions, call the number of the
person listed at the bottom of that first page and
ask. If you do not receive an answer you feel is
satisfactory, you have every right to contact an
attorney and describe the situation. The attorney
may charge you some modest amount for the
advice, and that is a good investment, because you
do not want to get into more trouble than you really
need by just ignoring a subpoena. Let your attorney
make the proper contact with the responsible
persons and provide you sensible information on
how to proceed. It saves time and money in the
long run.
See these pages:
Federal & State Felonies • Sex Offenses • Violent
Crimes • White Collar Crimes
I just received a Grand Jury Target Letter! What do I
do?
February 20, 2015
A Target Letter means that the District Attorney
thinks that it has substantial evidence you
committed a felony crime. The date of your
appearance listed in that letter invites you to go
before the Grand Jury and offer your explanation to
some crime which the authorities have been
investigating. The only people who testify before a
grand jury are usually the detectives who have been
investigation allegations against some citizens. On
rare occasions, a person who is not involved in law
enforcement will also testify. The District Attorney
decides whom to call as witnesses before a grand
jury.
You should probably not respond or testify. A
Target Letter is not a subpoena, so you do not have
to show up at all. You have the right to testify if you
want, but the cards are definitely stacked against
you. A grand jury process is very secretive and is
designed to help the District Attorney obtain an
indictment charging someone with a felony crime.
If the person suspected of committing a crime is
foolish to testify to the grand jury, he or she does
not even get to have a lawyer inside the grand jury
room. The room is closed and all statements are
recorded. If you say something that may be untrue,
you could be committing a separate crime. If you
are charged, anything you say could be used against
you.
This is one of the
reasons that the
District Attorney does
not like to risk even
calling an alleged
victim or lay person as a witness, because his or her
statements could later be used at trial for cross-
examination. It is easier to get an indictment and
keep the suspects (and their lawyers) in the dark
about the evidence if only the investigator is called
before the grand jury. That investigator will only
give the grand jury the juicy evidence that would
indicate you committed some crime. The DA would
love to have you out there, all alone, in front of up
to 23 grand jurors who only need to find "probable
cause" that a crime has been committed. Probable
cause is a very low standard; it doesn't even have to
be fifty percent likely that any crime was even
committed.
But remember: the grand jury does not find you
guilty or not guilty, it just moves the case closer to
trial by agreeing to have you indicted. Just being
indicted means the charge appears on the public
record and that you have to appear in court before a
judge. That alone can mess with a person's life! It
also affects the lives of the people around the
accused citizen.
If you receive a target letter, get yourself a lawyer
right away to start helping you. Even without you
actually testifying before the grand jury, New
Mexico is one of the very few states that permits a
suspect to present evidence to the grand jury in the
form of affidavits, questions to ask the witnesses,
and documentary or photographic evidence. This is
very tricky going, so do not try to do this alone! A
lawyer can help you bring together evidence that
might explain that no crime occurred or that you
are not a culprit.
See these pages:
Federal & State Felonies • Sex Offenses • Violent
Crimes • White Collar Crimes
What basic information is needed for criminal
prosecution cases?
August 1, 2014
You or someone you love can be prosecuted in
either federal or state court. The Rules are similar
but, as far as the consequences and all the factors
that influence how a prosecution is resolved, federal
and state courts are very, very different. .Federal
and state courts have different courthouses,
different set of judges, different set of prosecutors,
and different punishment for those who are
convicted. They even have a different way that
cases are brought from mere allegation to trial.
They even have a different prison system, but
prison looks a lot the same when you are behind
bars. It is our job to keep you from that humiliating
experience.
Many acts are crimes
that violate both
federal and state laws.
We use the word
"alleged" a lot because
that means the Government (by its chosen
prosecutors) claim that someone did a certain act
that violates one or more laws, and "alleged" means
it just hasn't been proven. The same alleged
criminal act can be prosecuted in either federal or
state courts and even in both. It is not like the
prosecutors must choose one forum (federal or
state) or the other, but they usually do.
Prosecutors of federal crimes are called "Assistant
United States Attorneys" and work under the
"United States Attorney" who is appointed by the
President for all fifty states (some of the states with
the largest populations have more than one United
States Attorney, who are each appointed for certain
areas). State crimes are prosecuted by the District
Attorney who is elected every four years in each of
our state's thirteen judicial districts, and Assistant
District Attorneys do the actual prosecuting.
Even (state) Assistant District Attorneys (ADA) will
admit that the more prestigious job is to be an
Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA). Many an
ADA works years to become qualified for an
position as an AUSA. The job pays much more, has
better benefits, and is better funded. All of which is
not to say that ADAs are not honorable and capable
attorneys. It is just a fact of life that goes into the
mix of your entire case.
A state court felony prosecution may begin with a
complaint that leads to a preliminary hearing or a
grand jury indictment. The state's most populous
county is around Albuquerque, and the preliminary
hearing process has not been used for many a year.
To be indicted by a grand jury, the person suspected
of a crime is sent by the DA what is called a "target
letter" to inform the suspect that a hearing on the
allegation will be conducted in secret a few days
hence.
This is the point at which most defense attorneys
wish you would contact us to represent you, because
we have a chance to get some evidence on your
behalf to the grand jury. We do not want you ever
to testify yourself before the state Grand Jury.
When the Grand Jury meets, it usually hears only a
short summary of evidence from the investigators
and must, then, vote by a simple majority of the
grand jurors present (up to 23) that it is more likely
than not that a crime occurred. That standard for
proof is a lot less than what is necessary to convict
you before a jury, but the mere filing of a charge
starts the long and agonizing process leading to
possible trial that can adversely effect your life
forever. The best result would be if you were never
charged at all.
The investigators of federal prosecutions simply
sign an affidavit to a complaint that is enough to
have you taken into custody. If you learn of an
investigation into your alleged conduct, try to get a
defense attorney to work for you right away, if you
can afford one. Sometimes, we can work with you
and the prosecutors to resolve misunderstandings
before things get even more expensive. If you
cannot afford an attorney at this "pre-indictment"
stage, you will soon be taken before a magistrate
Judge for a Preliminary Hearing and may be held in
custody until a federal Grand Jury meets to hear
just the Government's side of the case against you.
Then the really hard work begins. On the other end
of the prosecution is a different problem for accused
people, perhaps, the main difference between state
and federal systems. The United States Sentencing
Guidelines were passed in 1985, supposedly to take
away judges' discretion to vary sentences on the
same crime of conviction for different people. The
real reason is that the same Congress who passed
these severe, required penalties had passed, only
the year before, legislation to permit prisons to be
owned by private corporations for the first time.
These corporations needed to be assured of bodies
to fill their cells and be able to bill the taxpayers,
and this repulsive coincidence has, thirty years
later, left our "Land of the Free" with the highest
percentage of its population in prison -- by far --
than any other country in the world.
For thirty years, our office represents people
accused of crimes in both federal and state courts.
We handle primarily major felonies and only rarely
do DWI or misdemeanors. We usually do those
kind of cases when former clients have a special
problem that they want us to handle. Because we
are set up to litigate thoroughly, we handle those
cases well, but, if you are looking for a bargain low
price attorney to handle a DWI, please call one of
the many attorneys who are set up to handle a
volume of low-cost cases. Our office is set up for
individualized, one-on-one, intense commitment to
the more major prosecutions with severe and
permanent consequences.
Another nice thing about New Mexico is that we
have an active defense bar, which means you have
many capable lawyers who might help you or your
loved ones. The key is that you meet, assess, and
find that one committed lawyer with whom you feel
you can work to the best result. It is more than just
a smile, a handshake, a fancy office, the fee charged,
and even the reputation. It is all those things and a
lot more, and you must consider everything when
you make this major decision.
See these pages:
Federal & State Felonies • Sex Offenses • Violent
Crimes • White Collar Crimes
How does plea bargaining work?
June 30, 2014
I can sure try, but, no matter what I say, I'll have to
leave a lot out. Plea Bargains are the way most
criminal cases resolve, and without plea bargaining,
the criminal justice system would grind to a halt.
There simply are not enough attorneys and judges
and courthouses and law officers to take each case
to a trial.
If you ever hear some
politician telling you
"There is too much
plea bargaining" or
"I'll put a stop to plea
bargaining," you can bet your last dollar that he/she
is all bluster and ignorance. (And you can quote me
when you tell them that!) The lawyer's Code of
Ethics and Local Rules REQUIRE us to always work
toward resolution of a pending case by plea bargain,
out of respect to judges' limited time for conducting
trials and the enormous expenses of going to trial.
If you are considering some attorney who acts like
prosecutors are the enemy and postures on a
website how combative they are, be careful! This is
not even ethical. We defense trial lawyers are quite
capable of fighting to the death for you if a case goes
to trial, but it does not serve most people (whether
defendant or alleged victims) to go through the
agony of trial.
Trials are exciting for the lawyers but agony for the
participants. A good Defense attorney or
prosecutor should cultivate professional
relationship with the other side, because it ends up
serving the clients better than constant antagonism.
When you have honorable attorneys from both
sides, reasonable cops, and sensible judges, plea
bargains can be a very fair way to resolve pending
cases.
The Defense is already at a distinct disadvantage
when the client is charged, because the law officers
have usually been working on the case many weeks,
talking to witnesses and building evidence. Our
office examines very closely all the evidence against
our clients. We have several very experienced
private investigators who work for us and are
assigned to each case. They leave no stone
unturned in finding ways to support our clients; we
couldn't get the results that we do without their
excellent work. Although too many officers and
even prosecutors meet with witnesses and pressure
witnesses not to talk to anyone representing the
Defense, our investigators do their very best to get
the full story from the witnesses. They will also
work to develop other witnesses and forensic
evidence to support you.
When the case involves forensic evidence such as
DNA or ballistics, we shall find the best experts to
prepare a report that explains what the forensic
evidence really means. If our client has made
admissions or incriminating statements to officers,
we see if those statements occurred after they were
entitled to warnings of their precious Constitutional
rights.
A developing body of research shows how very often
people "falsely confess" to crimes they did not
commit and how law officers are trained to
specialize in twisting unsophisticated folks up in
knot to obtain admissions, whether or not the
admissions are true. Highly-qualified psychologists
can determine whether a suspect actually
understood his rights or was intentionally misled or
just conceding to get out of an uncomfortable
situation. We shall consider that option if it applies
in your case.
Once our investigation is complete, we can set a
time to talk to the prosecutor about the evidence
from both sides. Any competent defense attorney
cannot boast that he or she wins every case or has
special powers, because we have an obligation to
respect the alleged victims and the prosecutors;
they have reasonable concerns, too. If an attorney
misrepresents facts or law to the other side, he/she
may get away with such behavior once or twice, but
soon that kind of deceit hurts the lawyer's
reputation in the legal community and will hurt all
future clients. Over the past thirty years, our office
has developed a reputation with both State and
Federal prosecutors that helps reach a fair
resolution that respects both sides of the process.
As your advocate, we consider the hundreds of
variations on the your situation and your particular,
most important concerns. Sometimes, a client
comes to us and says that conviction of any charge
will destroy their family or job, so we really just
must to trial or discover a fatal flaw in the
prosecution that will convince the prosecutor to
dismiss the case without even going to trial. Other
times, the client know the risk of trial and wants to
see if we can narrow our differences with the
prosecutors. Sometimes, a client tell us from the
beginning, "I want to admit that I did something
wrong, but these charges are worse than what I
did."
It is our job to do all the above work and more, but
we do not make the final decision - you do. We give
you all the information possible, then you decide.
CAN YOU GIVE US EXAMPLES?
Of course, here are three:
1.
When Thomas' two-year-old son died
while in his custody, overeager investigators
suspected he was responsible for the head injuries
that killed him. He was charged with first degree
murder. We found a world-recognized pathologist
from Minnesota who examined the medical records
and concluded that the injuries had actually
occurred four weeks earlier, when the child was
living with his Mother.
Our investigator found
that the child had
fallen about eight feet
from the bleachers at a
high school basketball game during that time frame
and the subdural bleed probably began then. On
the eve of trial, the Government's own experts
finally admitted their error, agreed with our
pathologist, and the charges were dismissed.
2.
Nathan was a socially inept, naive young
man of 21 who lived his whole life in a remote
community of barely one hundred people. He never
had anything close to a girlfriend, except in his
dreams. When a young lady, whom he knew only
by texting, told him that she lived only a mile way,
that her Mother was gone for the morning, and that
he should come over to "have fun" with her, he
thought he would have his first sexual experience.
Instead, her Mother came home early, caught them
in the act, and only then did he learn that she was
just 14. He was looking at almost twenty years in
prison for criminal sexual abuse, but we developed
some law that his mistaken belief was a full defense.
The girl helped our case by being telling the
prosecutor that she never told Nathan her age and
was proud she looked so grown up. The prosecutor,
known to be a man of honor, took a look at these
facts, and we resolved the case by pleading Nathan
to a simple misdemeanor assault.
3.
We have had several clients who have
faced charges that required specific legal knowledge
and, by developing leaning disability issues, the
charges are quietly resolved with no jail time and,
oftentimes, no conviction. I never claim credit for
these resolutions, because they take a respected
examining psychologist and a fair-minded
prosecutor, to protect the client's interests.
These are among the many examples of how both
prosecutor and defense attorneys can work with the
families of the alleged victims and the accused
persons to reach a fair resolution that serves the
parties and society.
See these pages:
Federal & State Felonies • Sex Offenses • Violent
Crimes • White Collar Crimes
Why can't a simple majority of the Jury reach the
verdict?
July 25, 2013
SOME OF US WONDER WHY JURY VERDICTS IN
CRIMINAL TRIALS HAVE TO BE UNANIMOUS.
WHY CAN'T A SIMPLE MAJORITY OF THE JURY
REACH THE VERDICT?
Not all countries do it
this way, but most
countries that let
citizen-jurors make
the decision require
unanimous verdicts. There are good reasons why it
is this way.
First of all, remember that a jury verdict in a
criminal trial must be unanimous either way: every
juror has to vote "guilty," or every juror has to vote
"not guilty." Until all the jurors agree, one way or
another, there is no verdict to take back to court. As
an example of other ways to do it, back in the time
of Jesus, the the Hebrew elders formed a judicial
body known as the Sanhedrin to make decisions on
legal conflicts. If, at the end of a trial, all of the
Sanhedrin members (over 100!) voted "guilty,"
Hebrew law require that the verdict be vacated, and
the trial begun anew. This unique approach is
because the law presumed, if everyone voted guilty
on the first ballot, the trial could not have been fair.
(Think how long our cases would go on with such a
standard!)
In other Western democracies, a panel of judges
make the decisions in criminal trials, and they do
not have to agree on the verdict. If they vote 2-1 in
Britain, the verdict is set.
We have a long history of trial by a "jury of peers" in
this country, established in a time when early
Americans were very suspicious that a panel of
judges (almost always from the richer class) would
be too biased against any accused citizen. Before a
jury (of twelve or six, depending on the charge) and
alternates is even chosen to serve, the assigned
judge and attorneys for the participants are
supposed to ask questions of a larger group of
potential jurors to try and pick a fair and balanced
jury.
The process of jury selection is called voir dire, a
French phrase that means "to tell the truth." If you
go to trial with our office, we shall work closely with
you quite to review juror questionnaires (provided a
few days before the process of jury selection begins)
and receive your opinions on which jurors you think
will be more fair to you.
See more about violent crimes.